Eighteen years have passed since the establishment of the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) Authority. Over the course of those eighteen years, high speed rail in the state has been discussed and planned and delayed and delayed more.
There have been proposals, referendums, debates, studies and budgets, but no tracks laid, no passengers queued, no trains roaring between Los Angeles and San Francisco in the promised three hour travel time at speeds exceeding 200 mph.
I began looking into the state of American high speed rail in pursuit of a few simple answers. Why don’t we have the sort of rail infrastructure seen across Europe, in Japan and now in China? What do proponents and opponents say about the various projects underway today? Put simply, what are the pros and cons of funding and maintaining high speed rail lines in this country, and what do our legislators make of them?
Read the complete story at www.attn.com.
Related News
- When SMART Speaks, Washington Listens
- PRESS RELEASE: SMART-TD Sounds the Alarm On Barr Yard Job Cuts
- Cybersecurity Alert for America’s Railroads
- President Ferguson Puts Up 10K to Stop Racist Harassment At NS
- How Long Are Trains Today?
- Maryland Senate Advancing Two-Person Crew Bill
- Holding the Line
- Bad Order Tags Under Fire In Utah
- Remembering Brother Neal Galloway: A Railroader’s Railroader
- From Stuck in Traffic to Blazing the Trail: The Rise of AVP Markeisha Haynes