RRB_seal_150pxPersons claiming retirement, disability, survivor, unemployment or sickness benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) have the right to appeal unfavorable determinations on their claims.  The following questions and answers describe the appeals process for persons whose claims under the Railroad Retirement Act or Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act are denied, or who are dissatisfied with decisions on their claims.

1. How does a person initiate a review of an unfavorable decision on a claim and what are the time limits?

For all claims under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts there is a three-stage review and appeals process within the RRB.

An individual dissatisfied with the initial decision on his or her claim may first request reconsideration from the RRB unit which issued that decision.  An individual has 60 days from the date on which notice of the initial decision is mailed to the claimant to file a written request for reconsideration.  This step is mandatory before an appeal may be filed with the RRB’s Bureau of Hearings and Appeals.

In cases involving overpayments, an individual has the right to request waiver of recovery and also a personal conference.  In order for recovery of the overpayment to be deferred while a waiver request is pending, the waiver request must be in writing and filed within 60 days from the date on which notice of the overpayment was mailed to the beneficiary.  A request for waiver received after 60 days will be considered but will not defer collection of the overpayment, and any amount of the overpayment recovered prior to the date on which the waiver request is filed will not be subject to waiver.

2. What are the second and third stages of the appeals process and their time limits?

If dissatisfied with the reconsideration or waiver decision on a retirement, disability, survivor, unemployment or sickness claim, a person may appeal to the RRB’s Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, which is independent of those units responsible for initial and reconsideration decisions.  An appellant has 60 days from the date on which notice of the reconsideration or waiver decision notice is mailed to the claimant to file this appeal.  This appeal must be filed using RRB Form HA-1, which may be obtained from the RRB’s field offices or the agency’s website, www.rrb.gov.  The Bureau of Hearings and Appeals may, if necessary, further investigate the case and obtain reports through the RRB’s field representatives, designated medical examiners, and others who may be in a position to furnish information pertinent to the appellant’s claim.  If the appeal involves questions of fact, the appellant has the right to an oral hearing before a hearings officer.  In cases where an in-person hearing is held, it may be conducted in the RRB office closest to the appellant’s home.  In some cases, video conferencing or phone hearings are held.

If not satisfied with the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals’ decision, an appellant may further appeal to the three-member Board, which heads the agency, within 60 days from the date on which notice of the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals’ decision is mailed to the appellant.  The three-member Board ordinarily will not accept additional evidence or conduct a hearing.

3. What are the criteria applied to requests for waivers of retirement, disability, or survivor benefit overpayments, and unemployment or sickness benefit overpayments?

A person’s obligation to repay any erroneous benefit payments may be waived only if the following conditions are met:

(1) The person was not at fault in causing the overpayment; and (2) recovery of the overpayment would cause financial hardship to the extent that he or she would not be able to meet ordinary and necessary living expenses, or recovery would be against equity or good conscience.  “Against equity or good conscience” is defined in the regulations of the RRB as meaning that the claimant has, by reliance on the payments made to him or her, or on notice that payment would be made, relinquished a significant and valuable right or changed his or her position to his or her substantial detriment.

In cases involving unemployment or sickness benefits, there is an additional requirement that the overpayment must be more than 10 times the current maximum daily benefit rate.

Persons requesting waiver may be asked to complete a financial statement on a form provided by the RRB.

4. What happens if a person’s appeal is not filed within the prescribed time limit?

Failure to request reconsideration or to file an appeal within the allocated time period will result in forfeiture of further appeal rights, unless there is good cause for the delay.  Some examples of good cause include:  serious illness; a death or serious illness in the appellant’s immediate family; destruction of important or relevant records; failure to be notified of a decision; an unusual or unavoidable circumstance which demonstrated that the appellant could not have known of the need for timely filing or which prevented the appellant from filing in a timely manner; or the claimant thought that his or her representative had requested reconsideration or appeal.  If good cause is not established, further appeal is forfeited, except that the appellant may contest the determination that the request for reconsideration or appeal was not filed timely.

5. Are there avenues of appeal beyond the RRB?

Appellants dissatisfied with the three-member Board’s final decision may then file a petition with the appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals to review the Board’s decision.  In cases involving retirement, disability or survivor claims, the petition for review must be filed within one year after notice of the three-member Board’s decision has been mailed to the appellant.  In cases involving claims for unemployment or sickness benefits, the petition for review must be filed within 90 days of the Board’s decision notice.

6. Can employers contest the claims of their employees for unemployment and sickness benefits?

When an employer is a party to the claim for benefits, that employer may protest the payment of benefits, but such protests do not prevent the timely payment of benefits.  However, an employee may be required to repay benefits if his or her employer’s protest is ultimately successful.  The employer also has the right to appeal an unfavorable decision to the RRB’s Bureau of Hearings and Appeals.

7. Where can a person obtain retirement, disability, survivor, unemployment or sickness benefit appeals forms and assistance in completing the forms?

Requests for reconsideration of an initial decision must be in writing, but do not have to be on any specific form.  The appropriate form for waiver of recovery of a benefit overpayment is ordinarily enclosed with the overpayment notice.  As stated earlier, RRB Form HA-1, which must be used to appeal to the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals and the three-member Board, is available from the RRB’s Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092, or online at www.rrb.gov.  This form can also be obtained from any RRB field office, as can assistance in filing a request for review at each of the administrative levels.

Persons wishing to contact an RRB field office can call the RRB’s toll-free phone number at 1-877-772-5772.  Claimants can also find the address of the RRB office serving their area by calling this toll-free number.  Most RRB offices are open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
, except on Federal holidays.  Field office locations can also be found by visiting www.rrb.gov.

metra_logoCHICAGO (WLS) — A federal investigation into Metra’s operations has begun following three separate complaints that have raised red flags about safety.

Those three incidents happened within days of each other, one of them occurring a little bit south of the 35th Street station. The train was apparently speeding.

It happened last Monday morning on an inbound Rock Island train.

“Everyone screamed on the train when it was going so fast. It leaned and scared everyone,” said Metra rider Pat Boskey.

Read the complete story at ABC7 Eyewitness News.

oil-train-railBILLINGS, Mont. — U.S. railroads forced to turn over details of their volatile crude oil shipments are asking states to sign agreements not to disclose the information. But some states are refusing, saying Thursday that the information shouldn’t be kept from the public.

Federal officials last month ordered railroads to make the disclosures after a string of fiery tank-car accidents in North Dakota, Alabama, Virginia and Quebec, where 47 people died when a runaway oil train exploded in the town of Lac-Megantic.

The disclosures due midnight Saturday include route details, volumes of oil carried and emergency-response information for trains hauling 1 million gallons or more of crude. That’s the equivalent of 35 tank cars.

Read the complete story at The Washington Post.

Menges_Ken_2008
Menges

State Legislative Director Ken Menges of the Missouri Legislative Board reports that the 2014 Missouri legislative session has come to an end. The session saw several bills that had the potential to affect both SMART Transportation Division and Sheet Metal Division members in the state, one of which was House of Representatives’ Bill 1770, that would have introduced right-to-work legislation to the state.

H.B. 1770 passed in the state’s House, but failed to get the required constitutional majority needed to be sent to the Senate for passage. Click here to see how members of the House of Representatives voted on H.B. 1770. Similarly, House Bill 1617 – a bill introducing pay check deception – also passed in the House but met its demise when State Sens. Gina Walsh (D-Dist. 13) and Scott Sifton (D-Dist. 1) led a filibuster against the bill.

In expectation of the Environmental Protection Agency’s new regulations on coal-fired power plants, the legislative board supported H.B. 1631, a bill introducing legislation to develop emission standards in the state through a unit-by-unit analysis of each existing affected source of carbon dioxide by the Air Conservation Commission. Dave Zimmerman – third vice president of SMART SMD and president of Local 26 – is a member of the Air Conservation Commission.

“During the session, we were approached by Rep. Todd Richardson and former Senate Pro Tem Mike Gibbons (one of our avid Amtrak supporters when he was in the Senate and now a lobbyist for Peabody Coal) to testify in support of H.B. 1631,” Menges said. “With the help of Alternate National Legislative Director John Risch, the Missouri State Legislative Board testified at both the House and Senate hearings for this bill. The bill passed in the Senate with a 23-7 vote and in the House with a 129-14 vote.

“This bill is not high on Gov. Jay Nixon’s list, but with the great bipartisan support we were able to receive, the governor has told us he will take a good look at the bill.”

The board also supported H.B. 1707, which specifies that crew members operating a train, including operations at railroad crossings, are not required to present or display a driver’s license to any law enforcement officer in connection with the operation of a train in the state. The bill was passed on the final day of the legislative session, Menges reports, and has been sent to Gov. Nixon’s desk for his signature.

Durbin
Sen. Durbin

WASHINGTON – In response to concerns raised by communities across Illinois, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) June 3 called on Canadian National to address ongoing safety and traffic issues including: Canadian National’s lack of cooperation with the State of Illinois and Amtrak, which has hindered efforts to expand rail service in Northern Illinois between Galena and Rockford; increased rail traffic that has resulted in a record rate of blocked rail crossings; and Canadian National’s refusal to work with local communities, like Richton Park, to resolve safety issues.

“Last year, I met with Canadian National President Claude Mongeau to discuss ongoing concerns regarding CN operations along the Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway and new Amtrak service between Chicago-Rockford-Galena,” Durbin said. “Unfortunately, several significant issues remain unresolved, and I continue to hear from local communities looking for better cooperation from the rail company regarding their traffic and safety concerns.”

With the acquisition of the EJ&E Railway, Canadian National plans on significantly increasing freight rail traffic along the line (a four to six time increase in trains per day). In the decision to approve Canadian National’s acquisition of the EJ&E, the Surface Transportation Board (STB) established an oversight period of 5-years to monitor the operational and environmental impacts of the acquisition. In the June 3 letter, Durbin raised the possibility of extending that oversight period in order to ensure that the issues outlined below are addressed.

Lack of Cooperation Hindering Passenger Rail Expansion: The State of Illinois and Amtrak have been negotiating an agreement with CN to bring new passenger rail service from Chicago to Rockford and Galena. In May, the State of Illinois announced that due largely to the lack of cooperation from CN, it would be pursuing an alternate route between Chicago and Rockford along Union Pacific tracks. Because the only feasible rail route west from Rockford to Galena runs along the CN, the State of Illinois and Amtrak will not be able to provide service to Galena if CN continues to slow walk negotiations and makes unreasonable capital demands.

Failure to Respond to Community Safety Issues: Canadian National has not responded to even minor safety issues brought to its attention by communities along its rail line. Richton Park recently requested a small easement from CN to install safety fencing, using funding the community received through a grant from the Illinois Commerce Commission. Although these easements were required by the STB in several locations along the EJE, CN rejected Richton Park’s request and has been unresponsive to appeals to reconsider.

Increased Rail Traffic and Blocked Road-Rail Crossings: Increased rail traffic along the EJ&E has resulted in a record number of blocked road-rail crossings and increased delays throughout the EJ&E corridor. In the first quarter of this year, there have been 5,267 instances of crossings being blocked by trains for ten minutes or more – the highest number since CN took ownership of the rail line.

Durbin has been working to address community concerns about blocked crossings that exacerbate traffic bottlenecks and challenge emergency responders’ mobility, rail safety, noise, air pollution from additional congestion, and interference with proposed Metra expansions. In 2010, Durbin announced the City of Barrington received a $2.8 million grant to fund the planning, designing and engineering of a grade separation at the U.S. Route 14 and EJ&E crossing through the Department of Transportation’s Transportation Investments Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) program.

In 2011, Durbin and Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) sent a letter to members of the STB regarding the Village of Barrington’s petition seeking additional mitigation efforts from the Canadian National. The Village also commissioned a study regarding the impact of Canadian National’s increased use of the EJ&E line that bisects the community. The Village’s review found that the STB’s previous study contained several flaws in the methodology and provided results that diluted actual traffic congestion and traffic delay impacts.

In 2013, after learning of CN’s efforts to avoid paying its fair share of mitigation efforts in Lynwood and Aurora, Durbin sent a letter to the STB urging the agency to extend the deadline by which construction must start on critical grade separations, preventing CN from running out the clock on meeting their responsibilities to those communities.

The full text of Durbin’s letter to Canadian National is below.

Claude Mongeau
President and CEO
Canadian National Railway Company
P.O. Box 8100
Montreal, QC H3C 3H4

Dear Mr. Mongeau:

I am writing regarding CN’s poor communication and cooperation with Illinois passenger and freight rail stakeholders. We met last year to discuss local community concerns with CN operations over the Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway (EJE) and new Amtrak service between Chicago-Rockford-Galena. Since that time, several of the issues we discussed then remain unresolved, and I encourage you move expeditiously to address them.

The State of Illinois and Amtrak have been trying to negotiate an agreement with CN to bring new passenger rail service from Chicago to Rockford and Galena. Last month, the State of Illinois announced it is pursuing an alternate route between Chicago and Rockford along Union Pacific tracks. This decision was due largely to the lack of cooperation from CN, which owns the originally selected route between those two cities. Unfortunately, the only feasible rail route West from Rockford to Galena runs along the CN. The State of Illinois and Amtrak will not be able to provide service to Galena as long as CN slow walks negotiations and makes unreasonable capital demands.

Secondly, several communities have contacted my office with concerns about increased rail traffic along the EJ&E. The Village of Barrington and City of Aurora have been vigilant in promoting increased rail safety, especially for trains carrying crude oil and ethanol. These large unit trains and other freight trains are blocking crossings and increasing delays throughout the EJ&E corridor. In fact, despite CN’s claims that track upgrades would decrease the number and duration of blocked crossings, there have been 5,267 instances of crossings being blocked by trains for ten minutes or more in the first quarter of 2014 – the highest number since CN took ownership of the rail line.

Even minor safety issues are being dismissed out of hand. For example, Richton Park recently requested a very small easement from CN to install safety fencing with a grant it received from the Illinois Commerce Commission. These easements were required by the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in several locations along the EJE, but CN summarily rejected Richton Park’s and has been unresponsive to appeals from our office and the local community to reconsider.

The STB placed CN under an unprecedented six year monitoring period after your railroad completed the controversial purchase of the EJE. The monitoring period is in place to ensure CN fully complies with the promises it made when CN acquired the EJE. That monitoring period expires at the end of this year, but it may be prudent to extend this period while the problems outlined above remain.

I hope CN can resolve these issues as soon as possible. I stand ready to work with you to improve the safety and availability of passenger and freight rail service along CN routes in Illinois.

Sincerely,

Ri
chard J. Durbin
U.S. Senator

 

Two railroad companies want to prevent the public from getting details about oil shipments through Washington state, information the federal government ordered be given to state emergency managers after several oil-train accidents.

But restricting such information violates the state’s public-records law, so the state has not signed documents from the rail companies seeking confidentiality, said Mark Stewart, a spokesman for the Washington Military Department’s Emergency Management Division.

Read the complete story at The Seattle Times.

george_cahill_web
Cahill

Former UTU Vice President George J. Cahill, 85, died June 3 after a courageous battle with cancer.
A member of SMART Transportation Division Local 1978 at New York and the former Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen Lodge 328, Cahill began his railroading career as a crew caller on New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad in 1944. He became a mailroom clerk and later worked as a baggageman and brakeman. He became a ticket collector in 1952 and a passenger conductor in 1954. Before being elevated to the office of UTU International vice president, he served as a general chairperson from 1958 to 1976.
Cahill served in the U.S. Marine Corps and was an alderman from the City Point neighborhood of New Haven, Conn. He was appointed a member of the Connecticut Transportation Authority by Gov. John Dempsey and was appointed chairman of the Connecticut Public Transportation Authority by Gov. Ella Grasso. He was one of the 84 delegates of the Connecticut Constitutional Convention that revised the current Connecticut Constitution in 1965.
He is survived by his wife of 64 years, Sally Tracey Cahill, his sons, George (Jackie) Cahill Jr. of Branford; Robert (Isabelle) Cahill of Uxbridge, Mass.; Stephen (Gina) Cahill of Hamden; Michael (Sandra) Cahill of Guilford; and his daughter Kathleen (Andrew) Omicioli of West Warwick, R.I. In addition, he is survived by his sister, Ann Marie Eaton, 16 grandchildren and 12 great grandchildren.
Cahill’s friends and family will leave the W.S. Clancy Memorial Funeral Home, 244 North Main St. in Branford, Conn., Friday morning (June 6) at 9:30 a.m. for a Mass of Christian Burial in St. Mary’s Church at 10:00. Burial will follow in St. Agnes Cemetery in Branford. Friends may call June 5 from 4 to 8 p.m. at W.S. Clancy Memorial Funeral Home. For more information, visit www.wsclancy.com.

SEPTA_logo_150pxNearly 99 percent of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) members working for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) have voted to authorize a strike when a mandatory 30-day cooling off period under the Railway Labor Act ends in less than two weeks, BLET officials announced this morning.

Locomotive engineers could walk off the job or be locked out by SEPTA at 12:01 a.m. on June 14 unless President Barack Obama intervenes and appoints a Presidential Emergency Board (PEB), according to a BLET press release. A PEB would delay a strike or lockout, and would investigate and issue a report and recommendations concerning a dispute in negotiations, union officials said.

Read the complete story at Progressive Railroading.

WASHINGTON — The nation’s top railroad regulator drew withering criticism Tuesday for his agency’s record of safety enforcement against Metro-North Railroad.

The Federal Railroad Administration’s use of its power to fine railroads for safety violations “is a mockery of justice,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal with some heat in an interview after tangling with FRA Administrator Joseph Szabo during a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation subcommittee hearing.

Read the complete story at The Connecticut Post.

grade_crossing_webWASHINGTON – The Association of American Railroads (AAR) June 3 announced that North America’s freight railroads will host events in multiple cities across the country in observance of the sixth-annual International Level Crossing Day (ILCAD) aimed at raising public awareness about safe behavior around railroad grade crossings.

“Safety is the foundation for everything we do, and supporting ILCAD gives railroads another opportunity to help educate the public about being safe around grade crossings,” said AAR President and CEO Edward R. Hamberger. “Education and outreach are key to saving lives, so it’s up to all of us to spread the word and make people aware of the consequences of risky behavior around railroad tracks. One accident because someone was in a hurry or looking to save time is one accident too many.”

Across North America, freight railroads, community leaders, law enforcement and Operation Lifesaver, Inc., (OLI) are hosting grade crossing safety awareness events and conducting promotional outreach across the country. This includes things such as:

  • “Officer on a Train” rides where law enforcement officers are invited to ride on trains and observe motorist behavior at crossings;
  • train safety displays in passenger and commuter rail stations;
  • participation in local television shows and children’s programs, and
  • distribution of literature about railroad safety and a safety program targeting truck drivers.

Railroads have worked with communities and law enforcement to promote grade crossing safety and commit significant resources each year to educate the public on grade crossing and pedestrian safety. This includes the “See Tracks? Think Train!” campaign recently launched jointly by AAR and OLI.

These efforts have helped reduce grade crossing collisions and fatalities over the years, with grade crossing collisions in 2013 down 80 percent since 1980 and grade crossing fatalities down 70 percent since 1980. Grade crossing infrastructure improvements also help improve safety. Since 1980, the total number of public grade crossings has declined 40 percent, and the number of crossings with gates has increased 177 percent.

The ILCAD Campaign was established in 2009 by the international railroad community in conjunction with various highway organizations, the European Commission and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) to raise awareness among road users and pedestrians of the risks at grade crossings. To date, more than 40 countries around the world have participated in ILCAD. For more information on International Level Crossing Awareness Day, please go to www.ilcad.org.