CALGARY – The tug-of-war between railroads and pipelines in North American oilfields is only just getting started.
In recent months, the popularity of moving crude on tracks has sapped commercial support for new pipelines from oil fields in West Texas to North Dakota’s Bakken. Now it’s raising questions about the importance of Keystone XL, TransCanada Corp.’s controversial project designed to connect Alberta’s booming oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Read the complete story at the Financial Post.
Related News
- Ukrainian rail workers need our assistance
- Union Pacific corrupts FRA safety survey, involved members should call UP ethics hotline
- DIPP assessments drop to 32 cents per dollar of daily benefit coverage
- TD NTS room block hits capacity, more lodging being secured
- Colorado SLD: Ulterior motives fueled editorial regarding rail safety bill
- BLET buys into Ancora’s promises
- SMART GC Ellis issues statement on LACMTA’s emergency procurement declaration to acquire barriers
- SMART-TD maintains support of current NS leadership
- Online fundraiser established for Local 821 officer’s family
- Ground broken on Brightline West — new rail jobs incoming!