Robert Peterson, a BNSF conductor out of Local 951 (Sheridan, Wyo.), questions the cost and need for freight railroads to push into automated technology in an opinion piece published Feb. 12 on the Railway Age website.
Class I freight carriers are thriving with booming profits and record operating ratios, Peterson argues, and are doing so with two people in the cab and by supporting the efforts of crews with newly developed advances in technology.
In addition, he writes, Federal Railroad Administration data shows that the industry as a whole is going through a period of decline in accident rates.
“This data implies an improved safety trend is due in part to current operating rules that utilize two-person train crews and technological safety advances in train operations,” he writes.
And, while the fully autonomous Rio Tinto AutoHaul operation has drawn headlines, it cost the company upwards of $900 million, Peterson writes, and this kind of operation may not even be economically feasible in the United States with the differences in terrain, the 140,000 miles of Class I trackage and other considerations, including the type of materials hauled.
“Is the American public ready to gamble lives on a computer-run vs human-run freight train?” Peterson concludes.
Follow this link to read the entire column on the Railway Age website.
Related News
- Federal Protection for Train Crews Promised by Passenger Rail Crew Protection Act
- New Rail Safety Bill Addresses East Palestine “Vent and Burn” Failures
- Philadelphia Bus Operator Reinstated by Arbitration Victory
- Are You Registered to Vote? Check Your Status Today!
- CSX ENDS OPERATION REDBLOCK
- Registration Open for St. Paul Regional Training Seminar
- Important DOT Drug Testing Notice Affects Members
- Honoring the Life of Brother Ed Weathers, Jr.
- Members Helped Raise $200K for Brothers and Sisters in Need
- Resolve to Keep Your Timebook Current in 2026