NORTH OLMSTED, Ohio (October 3, 2019) — Today, the nation’s Class I rail carriers, along with a few other railroads, filed suit in federal district court in the Northern District of Texas in an attempt to undermine our collective bargaining agreements as well as the bargaining process under the Railway Labor Act.
The suit, filed just ahead of the beginning of the next round of national handling scheduled to begin with the Section 6 notice filing November 1, asserts that the carriers’ position that “the existing moratoriums do not bar their crew-consist-related proposals” is a minor dispute subject to arbitration.
As detailed in their complaint, this is not the first time that the rail carriers have attempted an attack on crew consist. SMART Transportation Division President Jeremy Ferguson, noting the carriers’ history of unsuccessful attacks on crew consist, stated, “this latest attempt is nothing new, and it will once again be met with a vigorous defense.”
The suit, denoted as BNSF Railway et al, v, Internat’l Assn. of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers—Transportation Division, has not yet been served on the SMART Transportation Division.
This article will be updated.
Related News
- Shifting Views on Pattern Agreement
- SMART-TD Pride on Full Display for Labor Day 2025
- Western States hold first apprenticeship contest since 2011
- Congressman Resurrects Attempt to Nullify Federal Two-Person Crew (2-PC) Rule
- SMART-TD Intensifies the Push for Stronger Transit Safety Laws
- SMART-TD Yardmasters Reach Tentative Agreement
- For Wisconsin’s State Legislative Director, Role is More Than a Title
- Get the Facts on the Union Pacific Arbitration Award from SBA 1208!
- New Jersey Passes Two New Pro-Labor Laws Backed by SMART-TD
- VILP Enrollment Extended Through September 26!