NORTH OLMSTED, Ohio (October 3, 2019) — Today, the nation’s Class I rail carriers, along with a few other railroads, filed suit in federal district court in the Northern District of Texas in an attempt to undermine our collective bargaining agreements as well as the bargaining process under the Railway Labor Act.
The suit, filed just ahead of the beginning of the next round of national handling scheduled to begin with the Section 6 notice filing November 1, asserts that the carriers’ position that “the existing moratoriums do not bar their crew-consist-related proposals” is a minor dispute subject to arbitration.
As detailed in their complaint, this is not the first time that the rail carriers have attempted an attack on crew consist. SMART Transportation Division President Jeremy Ferguson, noting the carriers’ history of unsuccessful attacks on crew consist, stated, “this latest attempt is nothing new, and it will once again be met with a vigorous defense.”
The suit, denoted as BNSF Railway et al, v, Internat’l Assn. of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers—Transportation Division, has not yet been served on the SMART Transportation Division.
This article will be updated.
Related News
- SMART General President Michael Coleman’s statement on reports that Kilmar Abrego Garcia will return to the United States
- PHOTO GALLERY: SEPTA Drivers Provide Bulletproof Barrier Feedback
- Strong Team Smooths Transition for New Local 406
- Sheet metal, transportation members discuss union pride for BE4ALL challenge
- New Bills Pass Thanks to Teamwork and Communication
- SMART-TD Stands with FRA in Defense of Two-Person Crew Rule in Federal Appellate Court
- Coal trains roll as Michigan power plant gets a lifeline
- SMART Canada statement on National Roofing Week
- A hero among us: Local 105 member helps save woman’s life on Los Angeles highway
- SMART-TD Calls for Legislative Action After Firearm Incident Involving Keolis Crew Member