NORTH OLMSTED, Ohio (October 3, 2019) — Today, the nation’s Class I rail carriers, along with a few other railroads, filed suit in federal district court in the Northern District of Texas in an attempt to undermine our collective bargaining agreements as well as the bargaining process under the Railway Labor Act.
The suit, filed just ahead of the beginning of the next round of national handling scheduled to begin with the Section 6 notice filing November 1, asserts that the carriers’ position that “the existing moratoriums do not bar their crew-consist-related proposals” is a minor dispute subject to arbitration.
As detailed in their complaint, this is not the first time that the rail carriers have attempted an attack on crew consist. SMART Transportation Division President Jeremy Ferguson, noting the carriers’ history of unsuccessful attacks on crew consist, stated, “this latest attempt is nothing new, and it will once again be met with a vigorous defense.”
The suit, denoted as BNSF Railway et al, v, Internat’l Assn. of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers—Transportation Division, has not yet been served on the SMART Transportation Division.
This article will be updated.
Related News
- New SEPTA operator’s stabbing shows how members’ safety is at risk
- SMART-TD Statement on Railroad Safety Enhancement Act of 2024
- SMART-TD, regulators testify that railroads can’t be trusted to regulate themselves
- K.C. bus agreement follows SMART-TD’s focus on coaching local officers
- Section 6 suggestions deadline is July 24
- Local 206 member discusses pride in union solidarity
- Retired General Chairperson David Haack passes
- GP Coleman to SMART-TD NTS attendees: “We will fight for the membership”
- DOL memo states that TAB workers on Davis-Bacon projects are entitled to prevailing wage
- NTS Day 3: Railroad safety improvements driven by member reports